Sabahudin Hasecic vs Martin Holler
Buehl rapid, 1992 · Result 1–0 · Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation (A89).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Sabahudin Hasecic vs Martin Holler with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Sabahudin Hasecic (2310)
- Black
- Martin Holler (2225)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Buehl rapid
- Year
- 1992
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation (A89)
About this chess game
This chess game between Sabahudin Hasecic (2310) and Martin Holler (2225) was played at Buehl rapid in 1992 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation (A89). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Sabahudin Hasecic games or Martin Holler games? This Sabahudin Hasecic vs Martin Holler encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Sabahudin Hasecic vs Martin Holler?
Sabahudin Hasecic vs Martin Holler (1992) finished 1–0, a win for Sabahudin Hasecic.
What opening was played in Sabahudin Hasecic vs Martin Holler?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation (ECO A89).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Sabahudin Hasecic vs Martin Holler, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.