Svend Hartling vs Jorgen Scholler Larsen
Corr, date unknown · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C17).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Svend Hartling vs Jorgen Scholler Larsen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Svend Hartling (2054)
- Black
- Jorgen Scholler Larsen (1720)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Corr
- Opening
- French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C17)
About this chess game
This chess game between Svend Hartling (2054) and Jorgen Scholler Larsen (1720) was played at Corr and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C17). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Svend Hartling games or Jorgen Scholler Larsen games? This Svend Hartling vs Jorgen Scholler Larsen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Svend Hartling vs Jorgen Scholler Larsen?
Svend Hartling vs Jorgen Scholler Larsen finished 1–0, a win for Svend Hartling.
What opening was played in Svend Hartling vs Jorgen Scholler Larsen?
The game opened with the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (ECO C17).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Svend Hartling vs Jorgen Scholler Larsen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.