Robert Hanzalik vs Pavol Podmanický
SVK/C/qf42 (SVK), 2007 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Robert Hanzalik vs Pavol Podmanický with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Robert Hanzalik
- Black
- Pavol Podmanický
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- SVK/C/qf42 (SVK)
- Year
- 2007
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81)
About this chess game
This chess game between Robert Hanzalik and Pavol Podmanický was played at SVK/C/qf42 (SVK) in 2007 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Robert Hanzalik games or Pavol Podmanický games? This Robert Hanzalik vs Pavol Podmanický encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Robert Hanzalik vs Pavol Podmanický?
Robert Hanzalik vs Pavol Podmanický (2007) finished 1–0, a win for Robert Hanzalik.
What opening was played in Robert Hanzalik vs Pavol Podmanický?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (ECO E81).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Robert Hanzalik vs Pavol Podmanický, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.