Rolf Hantke vs Peter Scholz
OWL Ch, date unknown · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Spielmann Defense (A32).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rolf Hantke vs Peter Scholz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rolf Hantke
- Black
- Peter Scholz (2064)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- OWL Ch
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Spielmann Defense (A32)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rolf Hantke and Peter Scholz (2064) was played at OWL Ch and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Spielmann Defense (A32). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rolf Hantke games or Peter Scholz games? This Rolf Hantke vs Peter Scholz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Spielmann Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rolf Hantke vs Peter Scholz?
Rolf Hantke vs Peter Scholz finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Rolf Hantke vs Peter Scholz?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Spielmann Defense (ECO A32).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rolf Hantke vs Peter Scholz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.