Anna Hampel vs Armin Waschk
Corr DDR, 1987 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense, Exchange Line (E58).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Anna Hampel vs Armin Waschk with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Anna Hampel (1342)
- Black
- Armin Waschk (2205)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Corr DDR
- Year
- 1987
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense, Exchange Line (E58)
About this chess game
This chess game between Anna Hampel (1342) and Armin Waschk (2205) was played at Corr DDR in 1987 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense, Exchange Line (E58). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Anna Hampel games or Armin Waschk games? This Anna Hampel vs Armin Waschk encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense, Exchange Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Anna Hampel vs Armin Waschk?
Anna Hampel vs Armin Waschk (1987) finished 1–0, a win for Anna Hampel.
What opening was played in Anna Hampel vs Armin Waschk?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense, Exchange Line (ECO E58).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Anna Hampel vs Armin Waschk, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.