Johannes Hampel vs Joachim Riessbeck
Plau am See (05.10.-13.10), 2001 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Ragozin Variation (E51).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Johannes Hampel vs Joachim Riessbeck with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Johannes Hampel (2190)
- Black
- Joachim Riessbeck (1807)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Plau am See (05.10.-13.10)
- Year
- 2001
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Ragozin Variation (E51)
About this chess game
This chess game between Johannes Hampel (2190) and Joachim Riessbeck (1807) was played at Plau am See (05.10.-13.10) in 2001 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Ragozin Variation (E51). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Johannes Hampel games or Joachim Riessbeck games? This Johannes Hampel vs Joachim Riessbeck encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Ragozin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Johannes Hampel vs Joachim Riessbeck?
Johannes Hampel vs Joachim Riessbeck (2001) finished 1–0, a win for Johannes Hampel.
What opening was played in Johannes Hampel vs Joachim Riessbeck?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Ragozin Variation (ECO E51).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Johannes Hampel vs Joachim Riessbeck, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.