Erkki Hallila vs Tadeusz Runowiecki
Baltic Sea tt6 bd08, date unknown · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Yates Defense (E83).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Erkki Hallila vs Tadeusz Runowiecki with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Erkki Hallila
- Black
- Tadeusz Runowiecki (2117)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Baltic Sea tt6 bd08
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Yates Defense (E83)
About this chess game
This chess game between Erkki Hallila and Tadeusz Runowiecki (2117) was played at Baltic Sea tt6 bd08 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Yates Defense (E83). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Erkki Hallila games or Tadeusz Runowiecki games? This Erkki Hallila vs Tadeusz Runowiecki encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Yates Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Erkki Hallila vs Tadeusz Runowiecki?
Erkki Hallila vs Tadeusz Runowiecki finished 0–1, a win for Tadeusz Runowiecki.
What opening was played in Erkki Hallila vs Tadeusz Runowiecki?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Yates Defense (ECO E83).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Erkki Hallila vs Tadeusz Runowiecki, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.