Szabolcs Halasi vs Tamas Borsavolgyi
2014 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Szabolcs Halasi vs Tamas Borsavolgyi with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Szabolcs Halasi (1677)
- Black
- Tamas Borsavolgyi (2213)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94)
About this chess game
This chess game between Szabolcs Halasi (1677) and Tamas Borsavolgyi (2213) was played in 2014 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Szabolcs Halasi games or Tamas Borsavolgyi games? This Szabolcs Halasi vs Tamas Borsavolgyi encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Szabolcs Halasi vs Tamas Borsavolgyi?
Szabolcs Halasi vs Tamas Borsavolgyi (2014) finished 0–1, a win for Tamas Borsavolgyi.
What opening was played in Szabolcs Halasi vs Tamas Borsavolgyi?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (ECO E94).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Szabolcs Halasi vs Tamas Borsavolgyi, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.