Feddy Faysar Jose Halabi Troisi vs Caico Soares Amaral
It Open, 2014 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Pawn Game (D00).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Feddy Faysar Jose Halabi Troisi vs Caico Soares Amaral with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Feddy Faysar Jose Halabi Troisi (1625)
- Black
- Caico Soares Amaral (1920)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- It Open
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game (D00)
About this chess game
This chess game between Feddy Faysar Jose Halabi Troisi (1625) and Caico Soares Amaral (1920) was played at It Open in 2014 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game (D00). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Feddy Faysar Jose Halabi Troisi games or Caico Soares Amaral games? This Feddy Faysar Jose Halabi Troisi vs Caico Soares Amaral encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Feddy Faysar Jose Halabi Troisi vs Caico Soares Amaral?
Feddy Faysar Jose Halabi Troisi vs Caico Soares Amaral (2014) finished 0–1, a win for Caico Soares Amaral.
What opening was played in Feddy Faysar Jose Halabi Troisi vs Caico Soares Amaral?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game (ECO D00).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Feddy Faysar Jose Halabi Troisi vs Caico Soares Amaral, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.