Willem Hajenius vs stylianos Efkarpidis
European Senior Team, 2011 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Willem Hajenius vs stylianos Efkarpidis with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Willem Hajenius (1983)
- Black
- stylianos Efkarpidis (1600)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- European Senior Team
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76)
About this chess game
This chess game between Willem Hajenius (1983) and stylianos Efkarpidis (1600) was played at European Senior Team in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Willem Hajenius games or stylianos Efkarpidis games? This Willem Hajenius vs stylianos Efkarpidis encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Willem Hajenius vs stylianos Efkarpidis?
Willem Hajenius vs stylianos Efkarpidis (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Willem Hajenius.
What opening was played in Willem Hajenius vs stylianos Efkarpidis?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (ECO E76).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Willem Hajenius vs stylianos Efkarpidis, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.