Andreas Skytte Hagen vs Henrik Smidt-Nielsen
XTRACON GM 2015, 2015 · Result 1–0 · Slav Defense: Exchange Variation (D13).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Andreas Skytte Hagen vs Henrik Smidt-Nielsen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Andreas Skytte Hagen (2396)
- Black
- Henrik Smidt-Nielsen (1908)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- XTRACON GM 2015
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Exchange Variation (D13)
About this chess game
This chess game between Andreas Skytte Hagen (2396) and Henrik Smidt-Nielsen (1908) was played at XTRACON GM 2015 in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Slav Defense: Exchange Variation (D13). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Andreas Skytte Hagen games or Henrik Smidt-Nielsen games? This Andreas Skytte Hagen vs Henrik Smidt-Nielsen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Andreas Skytte Hagen vs Henrik Smidt-Nielsen?
Andreas Skytte Hagen vs Henrik Smidt-Nielsen (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Andreas Skytte Hagen.
What opening was played in Andreas Skytte Hagen vs Henrik Smidt-Nielsen?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO D13).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Andreas Skytte Hagen vs Henrik Smidt-Nielsen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.