Joern Hagen vs Peter Holtz
Mittelfranken Team Ch 0405, 2004 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Variation (D61).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Joern Hagen vs Peter Holtz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Joern Hagen (1227)
- Black
- Peter Holtz (1810)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Mittelfranken Team Ch 0405
- Year
- 2004
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Variation (D61)
About this chess game
This chess game between Joern Hagen (1227) and Peter Holtz (1810) was played at Mittelfranken Team Ch 0405 in 2004 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Variation (D61). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Joern Hagen games or Peter Holtz games? This Joern Hagen vs Peter Holtz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Joern Hagen vs Peter Holtz?
Joern Hagen vs Peter Holtz (2004) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Joern Hagen vs Peter Holtz?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Variation (ECO D61).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Joern Hagen vs Peter Holtz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.