Radomir Hacik vs Milan Chovanec
2016 · Result ½–½ · Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense, Fianchetto Variation (C76).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Radomir Hacik vs Milan Chovanec with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Radomir Hacik (2172)
- Black
- Milan Chovanec (2136)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense, Fianchetto Variation (C76)
About this chess game
This chess game between Radomir Hacik (2172) and Milan Chovanec (2136) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense, Fianchetto Variation (C76). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Radomir Hacik games or Milan Chovanec games? This Radomir Hacik vs Milan Chovanec encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense, Fianchetto Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Radomir Hacik vs Milan Chovanec?
Radomir Hacik vs Milan Chovanec (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Radomir Hacik vs Milan Chovanec?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense, Fianchetto Variation (ECO C76).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Radomir Hacik vs Milan Chovanec, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.