Mohamad Habash vs David Courtney Fugate
9. Beirut Open 2017, 2017 · Result 1–0 · Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (A12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mohamad Habash vs David Courtney Fugate with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mohamad Habash (1834)
- Black
- David Courtney Fugate (1861)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 9. Beirut Open 2017
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (A12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mohamad Habash (1834) and David Courtney Fugate (1861) was played at 9. Beirut Open 2017 in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (A12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mohamad Habash games or David Courtney Fugate games? This Mohamad Habash vs David Courtney Fugate encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mohamad Habash vs David Courtney Fugate?
Mohamad Habash vs David Courtney Fugate (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Mohamad Habash.
What opening was played in Mohamad Habash vs David Courtney Fugate?
The game opened with the Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (ECO A12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mohamad Habash vs David Courtney Fugate, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.