Jukka-Pekka Haapasalo vs Juri Mavrichev
2003 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jukka-Pekka Haapasalo vs Juri Mavrichev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jukka-Pekka Haapasalo (2136)
- Black
- Juri Mavrichev (2069)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2003
- Opening
- English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jukka-Pekka Haapasalo (2136) and Juri Mavrichev (2069) was played in 2003 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jukka-Pekka Haapasalo games or Juri Mavrichev games? This Jukka-Pekka Haapasalo vs Juri Mavrichev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jukka-Pekka Haapasalo vs Juri Mavrichev?
Jukka-Pekka Haapasalo vs Juri Mavrichev (2003) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jukka-Pekka Haapasalo vs Juri Mavrichev?
The game opened with the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (ECO A14).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jukka-Pekka Haapasalo vs Juri Mavrichev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.