Artem Guzenko vs Aleksey Goganov
St. Petersburg RUS, City Ch S/F, 2010 · Result ½–½ · Ruy Lopez: Closed, Worrall Attack, Castling Line (C86).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Artem Guzenko vs Aleksey Goganov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Artem Guzenko (2136)
- Black
- Aleksey Goganov (2448)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- St. Petersburg RUS, City Ch S/F
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Closed, Worrall Attack, Castling Line (C86)
About this chess game
This chess game between Artem Guzenko (2136) and Aleksey Goganov (2448) was played at St. Petersburg RUS, City Ch S/F in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Worrall Attack, Castling Line (C86). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Artem Guzenko games or Aleksey Goganov games? This Artem Guzenko vs Aleksey Goganov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Worrall Attack, Castling Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Artem Guzenko vs Aleksey Goganov?
Artem Guzenko vs Aleksey Goganov (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Artem Guzenko vs Aleksey Goganov?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Worrall Attack, Castling Line (ECO C86).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Artem Guzenko vs Aleksey Goganov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.