Amal Gutyakulov vs Konstantin Patotosov
2009 · Result ½–½ · Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (A12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Amal Gutyakulov vs Konstantin Patotosov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Amal Gutyakulov (2003)
- Black
- Konstantin Patotosov (1922)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (A12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Amal Gutyakulov (2003) and Konstantin Patotosov (1922) was played in 2009 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (A12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Amal Gutyakulov games or Konstantin Patotosov games? This Amal Gutyakulov vs Konstantin Patotosov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Amal Gutyakulov vs Konstantin Patotosov?
Amal Gutyakulov vs Konstantin Patotosov (2009) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Amal Gutyakulov vs Konstantin Patotosov?
The game opened with the Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (ECO A12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Amal Gutyakulov vs Konstantin Patotosov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.