Mario Gutierrez Valero vs Ruben Domingo Nunez
2012 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Makogonov Variation (E71).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mario Gutierrez Valero vs Ruben Domingo Nunez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mario Gutierrez Valero (2108)
- Black
- Ruben Domingo Nunez (1904)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Makogonov Variation (E71)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mario Gutierrez Valero (2108) and Ruben Domingo Nunez (1904) was played in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Makogonov Variation (E71). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mario Gutierrez Valero games or Ruben Domingo Nunez games? This Mario Gutierrez Valero vs Ruben Domingo Nunez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Makogonov Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mario Gutierrez Valero vs Ruben Domingo Nunez?
Mario Gutierrez Valero vs Ruben Domingo Nunez (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Mario Gutierrez Valero.
What opening was played in Mario Gutierrez Valero vs Ruben Domingo Nunez?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Makogonov Variation (ECO E71).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mario Gutierrez Valero vs Ruben Domingo Nunez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.