Alexander Gutenev vs Petr Kostenko
Lozovatsky Mem A 2020, 2020 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexander Gutenev vs Petr Kostenko with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexander Gutenev (2457)
- Black
- Petr Kostenko (2433)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Lozovatsky Mem A 2020
- Year
- 2020
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexander Gutenev (2457) and Petr Kostenko (2433) was played at Lozovatsky Mem A 2020 in 2020 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexander Gutenev games or Petr Kostenko games? This Alexander Gutenev vs Petr Kostenko encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexander Gutenev vs Petr Kostenko?
Alexander Gutenev vs Petr Kostenko (2020) finished 1–0, a win for Alexander Gutenev.
What opening was played in Alexander Gutenev vs Petr Kostenko?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (ECO B43).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexander Gutenev vs Petr Kostenko, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.