Alexander Gutenev vs Ilia Akst
Chelyabinsk RUS, Open 2009, 2009 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (B81).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexander Gutenev vs Ilia Akst with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexander Gutenev (2348)
- Black
- Ilia Akst (2238)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Chelyabinsk RUS, Open 2009
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (B81)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexander Gutenev (2348) and Ilia Akst (2238) was played at Chelyabinsk RUS, Open 2009 in 2009 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (B81). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexander Gutenev games or Ilia Akst games? This Alexander Gutenev vs Ilia Akst encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexander Gutenev vs Ilia Akst?
Alexander Gutenev vs Ilia Akst (2009) finished 1–0, a win for Alexander Gutenev.
What opening was played in Alexander Gutenev vs Ilia Akst?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (ECO B81).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexander Gutenev vs Ilia Akst, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.