Rojus Gutauskas vs Valdas Bucinskas
Lietuvos Šachmatų Lyga 2026 | Aukščiausioji, 2026 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: French Variation (B40).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rojus Gutauskas vs Valdas Bucinskas with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rojus Gutauskas (1756)
- Black
- Valdas Bucinskas (2253)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Lietuvos Šachmatų Lyga 2026 | Aukščiausioji
- Year
- 2026
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: French Variation (B40)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rojus Gutauskas (1756) and Valdas Bucinskas (2253) was played at Lietuvos Šachmatų Lyga 2026 | Aukščiausioji in 2026 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: French Variation (B40). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rojus Gutauskas games or Valdas Bucinskas games? This Rojus Gutauskas vs Valdas Bucinskas encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: French Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rojus Gutauskas vs Valdas Bucinskas?
Rojus Gutauskas vs Valdas Bucinskas (2026) finished 0–1, a win for Valdas Bucinskas.
What opening was played in Rojus Gutauskas vs Valdas Bucinskas?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: French Variation (ECO B40).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rojus Gutauskas vs Valdas Bucinskas, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.