Aleksey Gusev vs Eduard Sosulin
Bogoroditsk RUS, Closed IM 2013, 2013 · Result ½–½ · Slav Defense: Exchange Variation, Symmetrical Line (D14).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Aleksey Gusev vs Eduard Sosulin with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Aleksey Gusev (1389)
- Black
- Eduard Sosulin (2349)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Bogoroditsk RUS, Closed IM 2013
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Exchange Variation, Symmetrical Line (D14)
About this chess game
This chess game between Aleksey Gusev (1389) and Eduard Sosulin (2349) was played at Bogoroditsk RUS, Closed IM 2013 in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Slav Defense: Exchange Variation, Symmetrical Line (D14). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Aleksey Gusev games or Eduard Sosulin games? This Aleksey Gusev vs Eduard Sosulin encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Exchange Variation, Symmetrical Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Aleksey Gusev vs Eduard Sosulin?
Aleksey Gusev vs Eduard Sosulin (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Aleksey Gusev vs Eduard Sosulin?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Exchange Variation, Symmetrical Line (ECO D14).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Aleksey Gusev vs Eduard Sosulin, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.