Maksut Gulen vs Aleksandr Viktorovich Chamaev
DJ-CT18/pr04, 2011 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack (B86).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Maksut Gulen vs Aleksandr Viktorovich Chamaev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Maksut Gulen (1575)
- Black
- Aleksandr Viktorovich Chamaev (2126)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- DJ-CT18/pr04
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack (B86)
About this chess game
This chess game between Maksut Gulen (1575) and Aleksandr Viktorovich Chamaev (2126) was played at DJ-CT18/pr04 in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack (B86). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Maksut Gulen games or Aleksandr Viktorovich Chamaev games? This Maksut Gulen vs Aleksandr Viktorovich Chamaev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Maksut Gulen vs Aleksandr Viktorovich Chamaev?
Maksut Gulen vs Aleksandr Viktorovich Chamaev (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Aleksandr Viktorovich Chamaev.
What opening was played in Maksut Gulen vs Aleksandr Viktorovich Chamaev?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack (ECO B86).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Maksut Gulen vs Aleksandr Viktorovich Chamaev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.