Harijs Gulbis vs Sergey Valentinovic Proskurnov
RCCA 20, pr11 (RUS), 2013 · Result 1–0 · Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense (C65).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Harijs Gulbis vs Sergey Valentinovic Proskurnov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Harijs Gulbis (1917)
- Black
- Sergey Valentinovic Proskurnov (1674)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- RCCA 20, pr11 (RUS)
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense (C65)
About this chess game
This chess game between Harijs Gulbis (1917) and Sergey Valentinovic Proskurnov (1674) was played at RCCA 20, pr11 (RUS) in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense (C65). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Harijs Gulbis games or Sergey Valentinovic Proskurnov games? This Harijs Gulbis vs Sergey Valentinovic Proskurnov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Harijs Gulbis vs Sergey Valentinovic Proskurnov?
Harijs Gulbis vs Sergey Valentinovic Proskurnov (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Harijs Gulbis.
What opening was played in Harijs Gulbis vs Sergey Valentinovic Proskurnov?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense (ECO C65).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Harijs Gulbis vs Sergey Valentinovic Proskurnov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.