Sarwar Gulam vs Tahmid Sami Syed Ahnaf
2019 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense, Russian Variation (D56).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Sarwar Gulam vs Tahmid Sami Syed Ahnaf with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Sarwar Gulam (1827)
- Black
- Tahmid Sami Syed Ahnaf (1161)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense, Russian Variation (D56)
About this chess game
This chess game between Sarwar Gulam (1827) and Tahmid Sami Syed Ahnaf (1161) was played in 2019 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense, Russian Variation (D56). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Sarwar Gulam games or Tahmid Sami Syed Ahnaf games? This Sarwar Gulam vs Tahmid Sami Syed Ahnaf encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense, Russian Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Sarwar Gulam vs Tahmid Sami Syed Ahnaf?
Sarwar Gulam vs Tahmid Sami Syed Ahnaf (2019) finished 1–0, a win for Sarwar Gulam.
What opening was played in Sarwar Gulam vs Tahmid Sami Syed Ahnaf?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense, Russian Variation (ECO D56).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Sarwar Gulam vs Tahmid Sami Syed Ahnaf, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.