Michel Guimond vs Alex Danilov
Pentes enneigees 45/30, 2019 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B47).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Michel Guimond vs Alex Danilov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Michel Guimond (1927)
- Black
- Alex Danilov (1836)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Pentes enneigees 45/30
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B47)
About this chess game
This chess game between Michel Guimond (1927) and Alex Danilov (1836) was played at Pentes enneigees 45/30 in 2019 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B47). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Michel Guimond games or Alex Danilov games? This Michel Guimond vs Alex Danilov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Michel Guimond vs Alex Danilov?
Michel Guimond vs Alex Danilov (2019) finished 1–0, a win for Michel Guimond.
What opening was played in Michel Guimond vs Alex Danilov?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (ECO B47).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Michel Guimond vs Alex Danilov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.