Leonardo Guidali vs Fernando Martinez Fernandez
2018 · Result 0–1 · Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation (B13).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Leonardo Guidali vs Fernando Martinez Fernandez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Leonardo Guidali (1619)
- Black
- Fernando Martinez Fernandez (1910)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation (B13)
About this chess game
This chess game between Leonardo Guidali (1619) and Fernando Martinez Fernandez (1910) was played in 2018 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation (B13). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Leonardo Guidali games or Fernando Martinez Fernandez games? This Leonardo Guidali vs Fernando Martinez Fernandez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Leonardo Guidali vs Fernando Martinez Fernandez?
Leonardo Guidali vs Fernando Martinez Fernandez (2018) finished 0–1, a win for Fernando Martinez Fernandez.
What opening was played in Leonardo Guidali vs Fernando Martinez Fernandez?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO B13).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Leonardo Guidali vs Fernando Martinez Fernandez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.