Oliver Gugenheim vs Scott W Kolb
CICL Playofffs, 2012 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Oliver Gugenheim vs Scott W Kolb with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Oliver Gugenheim
- Black
- Scott W Kolb (1768)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- CICL Playofffs
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Oliver Gugenheim and Scott W Kolb (1768) was played at CICL Playofffs in 2012 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Oliver Gugenheim games or Scott W Kolb games? This Oliver Gugenheim vs Scott W Kolb encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Oliver Gugenheim vs Scott W Kolb?
Oliver Gugenheim vs Scott W Kolb (2012) finished 0–1, a win for Scott W Kolb.
What opening was played in Oliver Gugenheim vs Scott W Kolb?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (ECO B85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Oliver Gugenheim vs Scott W Kolb, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.