Fernando Guerra Luaces vs Dario Rodriguez Gomez
2018 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D05).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Fernando Guerra Luaces vs Dario Rodriguez Gomez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Fernando Guerra Luaces (1933)
- Black
- Dario Rodriguez Gomez (1591)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D05)
About this chess game
This chess game between Fernando Guerra Luaces (1933) and Dario Rodriguez Gomez (1591) was played in 2018 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D05). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Fernando Guerra Luaces games or Dario Rodriguez Gomez games? This Fernando Guerra Luaces vs Dario Rodriguez Gomez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Fernando Guerra Luaces vs Dario Rodriguez Gomez?
Fernando Guerra Luaces vs Dario Rodriguez Gomez (2018) finished 1–0, a win for Fernando Guerra Luaces.
What opening was played in Fernando Guerra Luaces vs Dario Rodriguez Gomez?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D05).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Fernando Guerra Luaces vs Dario Rodriguez Gomez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.