Alberto Gueci vs J. Hans van Unen
EU/CT2020/ct 1 4, 2020 · Result ½–½ · Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (D87).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alberto Gueci vs J. Hans van Unen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alberto Gueci (2476)
- Black
- J. Hans van Unen (2464)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- EU/CT2020/ct 1 4
- Year
- 2020
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (D87)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alberto Gueci (2476) and J. Hans van Unen (2464) was played at EU/CT2020/ct 1 4 in 2020 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (D87). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alberto Gueci games or J. Hans van Unen games? This Alberto Gueci vs J. Hans van Unen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alberto Gueci vs J. Hans van Unen?
Alberto Gueci vs J. Hans van Unen (2020) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Alberto Gueci vs J. Hans van Unen?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (ECO D87).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alberto Gueci vs J. Hans van Unen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.