Jakob Gstach vs Christoph Menezes
2013 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian (A25).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jakob Gstach vs Christoph Menezes with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jakob Gstach (2120)
- Black
- Christoph Menezes (2308)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian (A25)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jakob Gstach (2120) and Christoph Menezes (2308) was played in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian (A25). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jakob Gstach games or Christoph Menezes games? This Jakob Gstach vs Christoph Menezes encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jakob Gstach vs Christoph Menezes?
Jakob Gstach vs Christoph Menezes (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Christoph Menezes.
What opening was played in Jakob Gstach vs Christoph Menezes?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian (ECO A25).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jakob Gstach vs Christoph Menezes, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.