Jakob Gstach vs Dieter Englisch
TCh-AUT 2 Ost 2011-12, 2011 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E37).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jakob Gstach vs Dieter Englisch with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jakob Gstach (2042)
- Black
- Dieter Englisch (2023)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- TCh-AUT 2 Ost 2011-12
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E37)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jakob Gstach (2042) and Dieter Englisch (2023) was played at TCh-AUT 2 Ost 2011-12 in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E37). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jakob Gstach games or Dieter Englisch games? This Jakob Gstach vs Dieter Englisch encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jakob Gstach vs Dieter Englisch?
Jakob Gstach vs Dieter Englisch (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Jakob Gstach.
What opening was played in Jakob Gstach vs Dieter Englisch?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (ECO E37).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jakob Gstach vs Dieter Englisch, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.