Klaus Gschwendtner vs Jan Havlik
2013 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (B31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Klaus Gschwendtner vs Jan Havlik with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Klaus Gschwendtner (2137)
- Black
- Jan Havlik (1929)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (B31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Klaus Gschwendtner (2137) and Jan Havlik (1929) was played in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (B31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Klaus Gschwendtner games or Jan Havlik games? This Klaus Gschwendtner vs Jan Havlik encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Klaus Gschwendtner vs Jan Havlik?
Klaus Gschwendtner vs Jan Havlik (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Klaus Gschwendtner vs Jan Havlik?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (ECO B31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Klaus Gschwendtner vs Jan Havlik, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.