Oswald, Dr. Gschnitzer vs Ralf-Michael Grosshans
2010 · Result 1–0 · Old Indian Defense: Normal Variation (A55).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Oswald, Dr. Gschnitzer vs Ralf-Michael Grosshans with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Oswald, Dr. Gschnitzer (2450)
- Black
- Ralf-Michael Grosshans (2188)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Old Indian Defense: Normal Variation (A55)
About this chess game
This chess game between Oswald, Dr. Gschnitzer (2450) and Ralf-Michael Grosshans (2188) was played in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Old Indian Defense: Normal Variation (A55). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Oswald, Dr. Gschnitzer games or Ralf-Michael Grosshans games? This Oswald, Dr. Gschnitzer vs Ralf-Michael Grosshans encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Old Indian Defense: Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Oswald, Dr. Gschnitzer vs Ralf-Michael Grosshans?
Oswald, Dr. Gschnitzer vs Ralf-Michael Grosshans (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Oswald, Dr. Gschnitzer.
What opening was played in Oswald, Dr. Gschnitzer vs Ralf-Michael Grosshans?
The game opened with the Old Indian Defense: Normal Variation (ECO A55).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Oswald, Dr. Gschnitzer vs Ralf-Michael Grosshans, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.