Joerg Gruenenwald vs Roger Gloor
TCh-SUI NatLigaA, 2010 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Joerg Gruenenwald vs Roger Gloor with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Joerg Gruenenwald (2336)
- Black
- Roger Gloor (2128)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- TCh-SUI NatLigaA
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81)
About this chess game
This chess game between Joerg Gruenenwald (2336) and Roger Gloor (2128) was played at TCh-SUI NatLigaA in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Joerg Gruenenwald games or Roger Gloor games? This Joerg Gruenenwald vs Roger Gloor encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Joerg Gruenenwald vs Roger Gloor?
Joerg Gruenenwald vs Roger Gloor (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Joerg Gruenenwald.
What opening was played in Joerg Gruenenwald vs Roger Gloor?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (ECO E81).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Joerg Gruenenwald vs Roger Gloor, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.