Daniel Groetzbach vs Joerg Pachow
2013 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind, Breyer Variation (B39).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Daniel Groetzbach vs Joerg Pachow with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Daniel Groetzbach (1962)
- Black
- Joerg Pachow (2275)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind, Breyer Variation (B39)
About this chess game
This chess game between Daniel Groetzbach (1962) and Joerg Pachow (2275) was played in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind, Breyer Variation (B39). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Daniel Groetzbach games or Joerg Pachow games? This Daniel Groetzbach vs Joerg Pachow encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind, Breyer Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Daniel Groetzbach vs Joerg Pachow?
Daniel Groetzbach vs Joerg Pachow (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Joerg Pachow.
What opening was played in Daniel Groetzbach vs Joerg Pachow?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind, Breyer Variation (ECO B39).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Daniel Groetzbach vs Joerg Pachow, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.