Juergen Groetzbach vs Christopher Debray
19. Sants Open 2017, 2017 · Result 1–0 · Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Juergen Groetzbach vs Christopher Debray with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Juergen Groetzbach (1732)
- Black
- Christopher Debray (2358)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 19. Sants Open 2017
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Juergen Groetzbach (1732) and Christopher Debray (2358) was played at 19. Sants Open 2017 in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Juergen Groetzbach games or Christopher Debray games? This Juergen Groetzbach vs Christopher Debray encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Juergen Groetzbach vs Christopher Debray?
Juergen Groetzbach vs Christopher Debray (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Juergen Groetzbach.
What opening was played in Juergen Groetzbach vs Christopher Debray?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (ECO B18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Juergen Groetzbach vs Christopher Debray, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.