Pawel Grochowalski vs Antoni Paprocki
date unknown · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation (E65).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Pawel Grochowalski vs Antoni Paprocki with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Pawel Grochowalski (2147)
- Black
- Antoni Paprocki (1330)
- Result
- 1–0
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation (E65)
About this chess game
This chess game between Pawel Grochowalski (2147) and Antoni Paprocki (1330) was played and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation (E65). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Pawel Grochowalski games or Antoni Paprocki games? This Pawel Grochowalski vs Antoni Paprocki encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Pawel Grochowalski vs Antoni Paprocki?
Pawel Grochowalski vs Antoni Paprocki finished 1–0, a win for Pawel Grochowalski.
What opening was played in Pawel Grochowalski vs Antoni Paprocki?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation (ECO E65).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Pawel Grochowalski vs Antoni Paprocki, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.