Raymond Grinsteinner vs Douglas R. Hadley
USCF/WS/20W14 (USA), 2020 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (E24).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Raymond Grinsteinner vs Douglas R. Hadley with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Raymond Grinsteinner (1516)
- Black
- Douglas R. Hadley
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- USCF/WS/20W14 (USA)
- Year
- 2020
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (E24)
About this chess game
This chess game between Raymond Grinsteinner (1516) and Douglas R. Hadley was played at USCF/WS/20W14 (USA) in 2020 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (E24). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Raymond Grinsteinner games or Douglas R. Hadley games? This Raymond Grinsteinner vs Douglas R. Hadley encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Raymond Grinsteinner vs Douglas R. Hadley?
Raymond Grinsteinner vs Douglas R. Hadley (2020) finished 0–1, a win for Douglas R. Hadley.
What opening was played in Raymond Grinsteinner vs Douglas R. Hadley?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (ECO E24).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Raymond Grinsteinner vs Douglas R. Hadley, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.