Jonathan I M Grant vs Thomas Lochte
London Classic Open 2016, 2016 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29).
Analyze this game
Open Jonathan I M Grant vs Thomas Lochte on the CipherChess board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Open the Analysis BoardMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jonathan I M Grant (2218)
- Black
- Thomas Lochte (2005)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- London Classic Open 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jonathan I M Grant (2218) and Thomas Lochte (2005) was played at London Classic Open 2016 in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jonathan I M Grant games or Thomas Lochte games? This Jonathan I M Grant vs Thomas Lochte encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jonathan I M Grant vs Thomas Lochte?
Jonathan I M Grant vs Thomas Lochte (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Thomas Lochte.
What opening was played in Jonathan I M Grant vs Thomas Lochte?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (ECO A29).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jonathan I M Grant vs Thomas Lochte, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.