Francisco Gragera Ledesma vs Vitor Cristiano Caeiro
2008 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Francisco Gragera Ledesma vs Vitor Cristiano Caeiro with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Francisco Gragera Ledesma (1858)
- Black
- Vitor Cristiano Caeiro (1677)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30)
About this chess game
This chess game between Francisco Gragera Ledesma (1858) and Vitor Cristiano Caeiro (1677) was played in 2008 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Francisco Gragera Ledesma games or Vitor Cristiano Caeiro games? This Francisco Gragera Ledesma vs Vitor Cristiano Caeiro encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Francisco Gragera Ledesma vs Vitor Cristiano Caeiro?
Francisco Gragera Ledesma vs Vitor Cristiano Caeiro (2008) finished 0–1, a win for Vitor Cristiano Caeiro.
What opening was played in Francisco Gragera Ledesma vs Vitor Cristiano Caeiro?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (ECO B30).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Francisco Gragera Ledesma vs Vitor Cristiano Caeiro, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.