Nadezhda Grabovets vs Anna Kaurova
2009 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Aronin-Taimanov Defense (E97).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Nadezhda Grabovets vs Anna Kaurova with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Nadezhda Grabovets (1974)
- Black
- Anna Kaurova (1866)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Aronin-Taimanov Defense (E97)
About this chess game
This chess game between Nadezhda Grabovets (1974) and Anna Kaurova (1866) was played in 2009 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Aronin-Taimanov Defense (E97). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Nadezhda Grabovets games or Anna Kaurova games? This Nadezhda Grabovets vs Anna Kaurova encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Aronin-Taimanov Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Nadezhda Grabovets vs Anna Kaurova?
Nadezhda Grabovets vs Anna Kaurova (2009) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Nadezhda Grabovets vs Anna Kaurova?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Aronin-Taimanov Defense (ECO E97).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Nadezhda Grabovets vs Anna Kaurova, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.