Boerries Grabenhorst vs Stefan Tietzen
Kassel Open, date unknown · Result ½–½ · Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (D87).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Boerries Grabenhorst vs Stefan Tietzen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Boerries Grabenhorst
- Black
- Stefan Tietzen (2159)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Kassel Open
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (D87)
About this chess game
This chess game between Boerries Grabenhorst and Stefan Tietzen (2159) was played at Kassel Open and finished ½–½. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (D87). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Boerries Grabenhorst games or Stefan Tietzen games? This Boerries Grabenhorst vs Stefan Tietzen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Boerries Grabenhorst vs Stefan Tietzen?
Boerries Grabenhorst vs Stefan Tietzen finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Boerries Grabenhorst vs Stefan Tietzen?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (ECO D87).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Boerries Grabenhorst vs Stefan Tietzen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.