Hendrik Gouwentak vs Hein Strick van Linschoten
1910 · Result 1–0 · Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (C49).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Hendrik Gouwentak vs Hein Strick van Linschoten with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Hendrik Gouwentak
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 1910
- Opening
- Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (C49)
About this chess game
This chess game between Hendrik Gouwentak and Hein Strick van Linschoten was played in 1910 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (C49). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Hendrik Gouwentak games or Hein Strick van Linschoten games? This Hendrik Gouwentak vs Hein Strick van Linschoten encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Hendrik Gouwentak vs Hein Strick van Linschoten?
Hendrik Gouwentak vs Hein Strick van Linschoten (1910) finished 1–0, a win for Hendrik Gouwentak.
What opening was played in Hendrik Gouwentak vs Hein Strick van Linschoten?
The game opened with the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (ECO C49).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Hendrik Gouwentak vs Hein Strick van Linschoten, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.