Etienne Goudriaan vs Daniel W Gormally
7. Batavia Blitz 2015, 2015 · Result ½–½ · King's Gambit Accepted: Cunningham Defense (C35).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Etienne Goudriaan vs Daniel W Gormally with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Etienne Goudriaan (2349)
- Black
- Daniel W Gormally (2489)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 7. Batavia Blitz 2015
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- King's Gambit Accepted: Cunningham Defense (C35)
About this chess game
This chess game between Etienne Goudriaan (2349) and Daniel W Gormally (2489) was played at 7. Batavia Blitz 2015 in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Gambit Accepted: Cunningham Defense (C35). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Etienne Goudriaan games or Daniel W Gormally games? This Etienne Goudriaan vs Daniel W Gormally encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Gambit Accepted: Cunningham Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Etienne Goudriaan vs Daniel W Gormally?
Etienne Goudriaan vs Daniel W Gormally (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Etienne Goudriaan vs Daniel W Gormally?
The game opened with the King's Gambit Accepted: Cunningham Defense (ECO C35).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Etienne Goudriaan vs Daniel W Gormally, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.