Etienne Goudriaan vs Sengupta Debraj
Dutch Open 2013, 2013 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Etienne Goudriaan vs Sengupta Debraj with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Etienne Goudriaan (2369)
- Black
- Sengupta Debraj (2555)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Dutch Open 2013
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Etienne Goudriaan (2369) and Sengupta Debraj (2555) was played at Dutch Open 2013 in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Etienne Goudriaan games or Sengupta Debraj games? This Etienne Goudriaan vs Sengupta Debraj encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Etienne Goudriaan vs Sengupta Debraj?
Etienne Goudriaan vs Sengupta Debraj (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Sengupta Debraj.
What opening was played in Etienne Goudriaan vs Sengupta Debraj?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (ECO D31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Etienne Goudriaan vs Sengupta Debraj, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.