Ivan Gonzalvez Tamarit vs Sergio Madero
2013 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ivan Gonzalvez Tamarit vs Sergio Madero with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ivan Gonzalvez Tamarit (1645)
- Black
- Sergio Madero (2107)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ivan Gonzalvez Tamarit (1645) and Sergio Madero (2107) was played in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ivan Gonzalvez Tamarit games or Sergio Madero games? This Ivan Gonzalvez Tamarit vs Sergio Madero encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ivan Gonzalvez Tamarit vs Sergio Madero?
Ivan Gonzalvez Tamarit vs Sergio Madero (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Ivan Gonzalvez Tamarit vs Sergio Madero?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (ECO E81).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ivan Gonzalvez Tamarit vs Sergio Madero, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.