Bolívar Ribeiro Gonzalez vs Graziano Ottolini
WLS/SRCCC/21/D3 (WLS), 2021 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation (B67).
Analyze this game
Open Bolívar Ribeiro Gonzalez vs Graziano Ottolini on the CipherChess board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Open the Analysis BoardMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Bolívar Ribeiro Gonzalez (2317)
- Black
- Graziano Ottolini (1977)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- WLS/SRCCC/21/D3 (WLS)
- Year
- 2021
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation (B67)
About this chess game
This chess game between Bolívar Ribeiro Gonzalez (2317) and Graziano Ottolini (1977) was played at WLS/SRCCC/21/D3 (WLS) in 2021 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation (B67). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Bolívar Ribeiro Gonzalez games or Graziano Ottolini games? This Bolívar Ribeiro Gonzalez vs Graziano Ottolini encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Bolívar Ribeiro Gonzalez vs Graziano Ottolini?
Bolívar Ribeiro Gonzalez vs Graziano Ottolini (2021) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Bolívar Ribeiro Gonzalez vs Graziano Ottolini?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation (ECO B67).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Bolívar Ribeiro Gonzalez vs Graziano Ottolini, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.