Rafael Gonzalez Mateos vs Angel Marcos Garcia Ruiz Fuentes
2013 · Result 0–1 · Indian Defense (A45).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rafael Gonzalez Mateos vs Angel Marcos Garcia Ruiz Fuentes with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rafael Gonzalez Mateos (2060)
- Black
- Angel Marcos Garcia Ruiz Fuentes (1952)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Indian Defense (A45)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rafael Gonzalez Mateos (2060) and Angel Marcos Garcia Ruiz Fuentes (1952) was played in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Indian Defense (A45). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rafael Gonzalez Mateos games or Angel Marcos Garcia Ruiz Fuentes games? This Rafael Gonzalez Mateos vs Angel Marcos Garcia Ruiz Fuentes encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Indian Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rafael Gonzalez Mateos vs Angel Marcos Garcia Ruiz Fuentes?
Rafael Gonzalez Mateos vs Angel Marcos Garcia Ruiz Fuentes (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Angel Marcos Garcia Ruiz Fuentes.
What opening was played in Rafael Gonzalez Mateos vs Angel Marcos Garcia Ruiz Fuentes?
The game opened with the Indian Defense (ECO A45).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rafael Gonzalez Mateos vs Angel Marcos Garcia Ruiz Fuentes, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.