Pedro 2013 Gonzalez Fernandez vs Borja Toriijos Garcia
2013 · Result ½–½ · Benoni Defense: Old Benoni (A43).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Pedro 2013 Gonzalez Fernandez vs Borja Toriijos Garcia with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Pedro 2013 Gonzalez Fernandez (1857)
- Black
- Borja Toriijos Garcia (1670)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Benoni Defense: Old Benoni (A43)
About this chess game
This chess game between Pedro 2013 Gonzalez Fernandez (1857) and Borja Toriijos Garcia (1670) was played in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Benoni Defense: Old Benoni (A43). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Pedro 2013 Gonzalez Fernandez games or Borja Toriijos Garcia games? This Pedro 2013 Gonzalez Fernandez vs Borja Toriijos Garcia encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Benoni Defense: Old Benoni.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Pedro 2013 Gonzalez Fernandez vs Borja Toriijos Garcia?
Pedro 2013 Gonzalez Fernandez vs Borja Toriijos Garcia (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Pedro 2013 Gonzalez Fernandez vs Borja Toriijos Garcia?
The game opened with the Benoni Defense: Old Benoni (ECO A43).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Pedro 2013 Gonzalez Fernandez vs Borja Toriijos Garcia, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.